<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Productivity on Vic Boomer</title>
    <link>https://vicboomer.com/tags/productivity/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Productivity on Vic Boomer</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>nl</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://vicboomer.com/tags/productivity/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Coding agents are better than you think</title>
      <link>https://vicboomer.com/essays/en-coding-agents-are-better-than-you-think/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://vicboomer.com/essays/en-coding-agents-are-better-than-you-think/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Many developers say AI isn&amp;rsquo;t good enough to build with seriously. That judgment sounds level-headed. It&amp;rsquo;s increasingly based on an outdated frame of reference.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Coding agents make mistakes. That&amp;rsquo;s beyond dispute. But something structural has changed in recent months: the production layer of software has been extremely compressed. Tasks that used to take days or weeks are now — when properly scoped — completed in hours or minutes.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That difference is underestimated.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
